Viewing Options

This site is best viewed using:

 

Social
Introduction

 

How do we incarnate the body of Christ in this new frontier, this increasing wilderness? What do the roots of Christianity, of the apostles first forays into the world have to say for the church today? These are the questions that drive me. How are we to be the church in a culture that has forgotten the ways of Christ?

The call of the church today is to abandon its fortresses and to become nomads, following the breath of God as he fills the world with life; to pursue the shadow of an unrelenting and unceasing God that is passionately reclaiming what is his. I want to understand how he spoke through his first apostles as he called together and formed the body of believers in the upper room with his holy fire. I want to inhabit the words and minds of the ancient theologians and mystics that sought God above all else. Through all of this though I want to gain an understanding on how to inspire, lead, and bring others along on the narrow path, to one day see the new heavens and the new earth in all their glory, and to see the face of my savior and embrace his feet in awe.

This journey is both intimately personal, and at the same time impossible without being in community with other believers and unbelievers alike. For truly as the gospel states we all have sinned, and fallen short of God’s glory, but praise be the cross is sufficient for all who embrace it’s story.

-David

My Hosting Provider
Powered by Squarespace

Entries in Missional Church (8)

Friday
Jul092010

An Exilic Faith - Prelude - King Saul

Within literature and theater there exists the archetype of the tragic hero, or the tragic character.  Shakespeare’s Hamlet, Melville’s Captain Ahab.  There begins at some point a hope that they will be redeemed, that some good will come and they can hold their head up high; however this hope is maligned by the character’s own actions.  Within Scripture we have no better (or worse?) example of a tragic character than in Saul, the first King of Israel.

It was with great anticipation that Saul was crowned king, and with great reserve that title given.  The prophet Samuel warned against it, and even Saul at the time was reluctant to bear it’s weight, hiding in a storehouse.  For all the good that Saul accomplished in his time, the book of Chronicles provides this haunting epitaph, “Saul died because he was unfaithful to the Lord; he did not keep the word of the Lord and even consulted a medium for guidance, and did not inquire of the Lord. so the Lord put him to death and turned the kingdom over to David son of Jesse.”

Saul was chosen by God to be a great king, but Saul was consumed with a fear for his position and power that drove him towards insanity and paranoia.  He did not truly trust in the Lord’s provision for himself or his nation.  And it is with this example that the long road toward exile begins.

Thursday
Jul082010

An Exilic Faith - Introduction

Jews in ExileI am beginning to read through the three books of Chronicles, Ezra, and Nehemiah.   My primary goal is one of inspiration as I seek to gain a better understanding of what God calls his people to.  Some central themes are the right worship of God, faithfulness to God and his wishes, and rebuilding a communal identity.  I believe that as we better understand the story of the nations of Israel and Judah, and their fall into exile, we can better begin to understand the reality of our present situation as Christ’s followers in the western world today.

The exile can be used as a metaphor from which we can draw understanding of our post-Christendom context, a context that presents unique challenges to a Constantinian influenced faith.  Whereas Christian’s once held the power of the culture, this has waned as secularism has taken root in the west.  If we are to move beyond and not just subsist but thrive as a faith we must, like David, forgo the armor offered us in worldly power, and trust in God’s protection, provision, and promise to be with his faithful to the end.

So what might that this exilic faith look like?  Arthur Glasser pointed to two tasks handed to the exiled Hebrews; first they were to survive through the building of houses and to have families, and second they were to seek the peace shalom, and prosperity of the cities they inhabited while in exile, and to pray to God for the city. (Glasser, 129-30) Their tasks were to become productive and integral participants in their pagan surroundings; not as partakers in pagan ritual, but as the ‘salt and light’ of their communities.  Distinctly God’s people, but partnered in and partaking in the society as a whole.

As Christendom has wained the impulse of those in power in Christian circles when it comes to civic culture has been one of retreat.  We have taken our ball and gone home, relegating ourselves to playing on our courts as we await others to breach our ghetto.  An exilic faith though ask that we relinquish our Constantinian hold onto power in exchange for a lasting influence, influence that begins in building relationships in our communities, praying for our communities, seeking the prosperity of our community as a whole.  As we continue to ride on the shifting sands of our post-modern context it will be increasingly important for us to begin to de-institutionalize the church within our societies as bastions of power.

As Children we would often turn over a large stone to expose the earth underneath and peer at the breaking through of the life that lives just under the surface.  As we move into our communities we are to be holy stone turners, exposing the breaking through of God’s Kingdom with our own abiding presence as signposts for the Kingdom; but this only takes place if we put our backs into it, get a bit of dirt under our fingernails as we expose ourselves the realities of the pain and brokenness around us.  A pain and brokenness that can’t be healed through acts of congress, or getting them to attend your Christian event—rather it can only be healed through the pouring out of Christ into their lives through his Spirit, his Body, and his Blood of which we are a sign.

Embrace your exile my brothers and sisters.

 

Glasser, Arthur. 2003. Announcing the Kingdom: The Story of God’s Mission in the Bible. Grand Rapids, MI. Baker Academic

Tuesday
Apr132010

The Importance of Ritual in Transformational Community

At the core of our being we long for another or others to share our life with.  Our first inclination as humans is bonded and intimate community which begins with our family.  In our earliest moments we bond to our mother as we nurse, her hand caressing our head, cradling us to her.  We recognize the smell of our father, the roughness of his face against ours.  From the start we reach out and latch on with our hands when a finger is presented.  Our instinctual desire is connection, intimacy, and belonging.

As we grow so does our community, starting with our parents and siblings, then our extended family, next our neighbors and community, and then school friends.  As we live we throw and ever larger net that establishes our community.  Some of course are closer, and others more distant.  This net however is only one abstract layer in many layers that we establish.  These are layers of affinity, of attraction, of like-minded and mutual story.


At the core of these communities lies ritual; our Sunday morning brunch of bagels and coffee, every June at the cabin, always turning our ball-cap backwards in the 9th inning when our team is behind.  Ritual, in it's broadest sense, is any observance or practice that connects us deeper into our communities.  Through our rituals we grow, we understand, we are.

Without rituals, or without understanding the ritual others are engaging in, we are missing out on what it means to be a member, a native, of a community or tribe.  Followers of Christ were provided a ritual by our Lord, Jesus Christ.  On the night of his betrayal Jesus celebrated the passover feast with his disciples, and in that time he established the ritual of Holy Communion, the Eucharist.  Through observing this ritual we identify ourselves not just as a disciple of Jesus, but as part of the broader community of the Christian church.

When we are at a baseball game we expect certain things to happen.  The seventh inning stretch, the singing of 'Take Me Out to the Ballgame'.  Baseball isn't just a spectator sport, it is a community of baseball faithful observing and participating in the rhythm and ritual of the game.

What would happen if we removed the seventh inning stretch because our fast paced society has decided that ritual takes up too much time?  What if we removed the traditional songs and chants because they made no sense to a person from another community or culture?  We might have men out on the field hitting a ball with a bat; but it could be argued that they are not really playing baseball as there is no observance of ritual, of the narrative rhythm of the game that makes it unique and links it to tradition.  In other words by bifurcating ritual from community we destroy them, destroying the tangible meaning they share when celebrated together.

Many Evangelical churches have lost sight of this simple truth; by removing ritual we destroy what makes our gathering a community.  If you had never witnessed a baseball game before you might wonder why certain things are done, why certain words are said.  Likewise if you were a protestant entering a Catholic mass you might be caught off guard by the ritual of the service.  In a misguided attempt to turn sabbath, the celebration of the Eucharistic community, into an accessible and evangelical medium those of us in the evangelical world have actually done those outside a church a disservice, we have watered down the Good News in favor of pluralistic and secularized interests.  Rather than making the community more open, we have gotten rid of anything that makes us uniquely the followers of Christ.

No doubt that John Wesley, a founder of my tribe (as Leonard Sweet might say), was evangelical in is Sunday sermons, but he realized that the mission of the church wasn't to be found in the pulpit, but in the streets.  Wesley and the methodists were condemned by the Church of England because rather than catering to the genteel and domesticated patrons of the church he would descend into the work places of those far from faith.  If they could not attend the church on Sunday he would follow God's mission into the world, to where people were at.  Evangelism takes place out in creation, in the day-to-day places.  Sabbath and it's rituals are meant for the faithful and those seriously exploring faith.  Sabbath and Eucharist are peculiar, but also compelling.

Through the systematic removal of our peculiar rituals as followers of Jesus in favor of pluralistic appeal we have not expanded the body of Christ; rather we have stretched it thin, watered it down, domesticated it so that we are palatable in the mouths of those not yet part of the Jesus tribe.  We have replaced the call to Eucharist (community) with something devoid of the calling cards that make Christian worship what it should be.  Through our attempt to provide a seeker-sensitive approach we have altered Sabbath beyond it's original intent.  As Alan Hirsch would say we have tried to be an extractional force; attempting, like a vacuum cleaner, to pull folks out of the world and into the church.  We have asked them not only to do all of the work of entering the community, once they braved the waters we have nothing compelling to share.

I am concerened that we are failing as churches because we have become the exact thing we tried so hard to avoid.  Through the removal of ritual we have created a community devoid of anything inspiring, challenging, and peculiar.  What attracts people to baseball, more so than the act of a bat hitting a ball, is the community of the faithful, their peculiar ways of being baseball fans.  In short baseball (and sport in general) offers a far more compelling narrative to be a part of than the average evangelical church, and it is largely rooted in the evangelical church's desire to be more like the world than like the Eucharistic Jesus Tribe of the New Testament.

I am not advocating an exclusiveness; rather a uniqueness of being that incarnates the gospel.  If the evangelical church is to survive it must begin the act of reclaiming it's place as a peculiar community in which ritual; scripture reading, prayer, and Eucharist are a vibrant and visible part of their narrative.  It is only by embracing our peculiarities as followers of Christ that we have anything compelling to offer the world.  We can't water down our wine and expect anyone to drink it, let alone come back for more.

Friday
Mar262010

Repenting my Missionality

I just want you to know that I can be a bit of a jerk at times.  The thing that makes it insidious is that often I only have the courage to be a jerk to you in my head, to judge you wrongly or make an assumption and not follow it up with open and honest dialogue.  May you forgive me.

What is my point?  My point is that judgment based attitudes can often corrupt very good things.  Take Missional for example.  I love the theological concept that we, as Christ's body, are in pursuit of and working within what is called the mission of God (missio Dei).  At the core of missional and trinitarian theology lies the concept of relationship; ours to God, ours to each other, and ours together to God.  Missional practice takes us out into the world in relational ways to embody (to enflesh) the mission God is already doing/forming in the hearts of men.

For me the problem is that there is God's missionality, and then there is my missionality.

In my missionality I have tended to look down on fellow brothers and sisters in Christ that I judged were guilty of wanting 'to be fed' to 'go to church' rather than 'be the church'.  The problem with this attitude is that I replaced a judgmental attitude towards those outside of the church towards those inside the church.  Rather than saying 'come as you are' to Christians that I felt weren't getting It I spoke derisively about those kinds of Christians as consumer Christians.  I felt that they could only be part of my community if they got themselves together first and got their heads screwed on straight, or got their spiritual house in order first.

I want to apologize.  I must repent of my missionality, and again rebuild towards God's ongoing mission and towards God's heart for all of humanity.  The gospel, the good news, of Jesus Christ is not spoken at the expense of any, but it is for everyones benefit.  I ask my brothers and sisters that have heard that good news to forgive me.

Thursday
Aug202009

Towards a Missional Church

A recent post on the Christianity Today website covered the news that two Neo-Reformed mega-churches pastored by John Piper and Mark Driscoll would each be starting their own degree-granting and I am guessing accredited seminaries. Many have decried this from the standpoint that they believe any seminary built up under the auspices of an iconic figure, like either of these men are in their circles, is bound to produce ministers and theologians that are indoctrinated and dogmatic in regards to a particular theological system.

I would argue though that this trap has long affected schools and seminaries that are rigidly aligned within the hierarchy of any religious institution. It is a safe bet that you will not have many undergrad theology classes in the Nazarene spectrum dealing heavily with something like a doctrine of election for instance. We do not have to be attending Liberty or Oral Roberts to find ourselves being taught with a particular theological framework and assumptions in play.

I believe it was last year that there was much turmoil at Olivet as one of the professors was rebuffed for his stance of theological-evolution. There are are many ways in which a school that is aligned with a particular religious institution can be influenced by their affiliated denominations, it doesn't require a single iconic individual. I also do not mean to single out Nazarene institutions with this particular post, as this exists across the private religious school spectrum, however the Nazarene schools are the one with which I am most familiar.

The issue I take with denominational (or church based) institutions is that they are pressured to take ecumenical and broad-based theological constructs and then recast and stamp them with their own particularity. There has been a recent push within the Nazarene church to identify ourselves as Missional. The concern I have with the Nazarene interpretation and usage of missional is that it is closely aligned with eduction in our Nazarene higher educational system. It is an ecumenical error to use the term missional in a particularistic and self-advantageous context. It is also important that if the church is serious about being missional that we move beyond the limitations of our current educational paradigm.

Rick Meigs describes missional:

A helpful term used to describe what happens when you and I replace the "come to us" invitations with a "go to them" life. A life where "the way of Jesus" informs and radically transforms our existence to one wholly focused on sacrificially living for him and others and where we adopt a missionary stance in relation to our culture. It speaks of the very nature of the Jesus follower."

In many ways missionality is a direct attempt to bring back together the realms of ortho-doxy and ortho-praxy under the same ecclesial tent. It is a shift in critical theological thinking that begins to place missiology in a paramount context to ecclesiology. In order for an institution of learning to truly be missional it must be intentional in it's incarnational presence as the body of Christ.

If missionality is to be taken seriously in our educational contexts it must be approached ecumenically and can not smack of the particularization that is inherent in denominational thinking. Missional can not and must not be reduced to a selling point for future students, rather it must be a fundamental element and core in the educational effort and graduation requirements. Missions and missional theology must be taught and required for every single degree if we are going to claim missional as a trait. It must be pervasive and and dive deeper than one or two courses out of 30. What the western church needs more than anything is thoroughly missiologically trained students, students that are not just competent in exegesis, homiletics, history and doctrine.

The second problem I have with this alignment of missional with our educational systems is that I am frankly not sure our higher educational schools are up to the paradigm shift's challenge. There is a tie to historical tradition and modernistic assumptions on the importance of a particular pedagogical method of training. There needs to be room for parish-based forms of education (somewhat ironic to my point I know) that are rooted in incarnational ministry and experience. With the technological means of today the years of needing to convene in a single geographical location to interact with peers, scholars and professors is dying and outmoded. While I understand the need for a handful of academic-track students to maintain residence that is not what the vast majority of our future ministers require or even need.

Imagine, if you will, the ability of students to live together in small cohorts of 15 or 20 in a given city or area of the world and to engage as a cohort together in missional living and education. Each group working through the same coursework and authors together in order to build community and trust. Each student is required to give a portion of their time to being present in their communities and local church bodies. What impact could this have on the missionality of our denomination?

I do not believe the method of education I propose is the best or only, but simply the one I believe would begin to transform the Nazarene church into a truly missional body of believers that is ready and equipped to engage a globalized and multi-cultural reality with a knowledge not only of history and study but of engagement and incarnation.